Case 2406293/2023 · Employment Tribunal
J O Galvin-Jones v Rupee Solutions UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406293/2023
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J O Galvin-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dunlop entered judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,750.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract, identified in the judgment as unpaid expenses, and ordered damages of £161.75. The judgment was sent to the parties on 10 October 2023 and included the standard notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,750.00. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract (unpaid expenses) and ordered damages of £161.75. | Upheld | — | £162 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,912
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.