Case 2406306/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Eckersley Respondent Taylors Confectioners Limited v Mr J Halson, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406306/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Eckersley Respondent Taylors Confectioners Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with a preliminary issue. Employment Judge Batten, sitting alone in Manchester on 26 October 2020, decided that the claimant's continuous service commenced on 1 November 2014.
By consent of both parties, the hearing was then adjourned generally for the term of settlement agreed between them to be implemented. The judgment records that if no request was made before 23 November 2020 to restore the claim for further hearing, the claim would be dismissed on that date on withdrawal by the claimant, and that the claimant had consented to that course at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment was on a preliminary issue only. The tribunal decided that the claimant's continuous service commenced on 1 November 2014 and did not determine the substantive tribunal claims in this decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.