Case 2406312/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Smith v GM Buses South Limited T/a Stagecoach Manchester/Stagecoach Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406312/2019
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claims. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, and it does not identify a remedy or make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The text does not itemise the withdrawn claims, so this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The text does not itemise the withdrawn claims, so this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The text does not itemise the withdrawn claims, so this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The text does not itemise the withdrawn claims, so this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.