Case 2406314/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Comer v Prime Logistics — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406314/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Comer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr L Comer's claim against Prime Logistics. It recorded that, by letter dated 19 March 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any separate monetary assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the substantive claim type; this classification follows the case listing context. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the tribunal's letter dated 19 March 2021 inviting representations or a request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.