Case 2406323/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Omorogbe v Mr R Wegiel and Miss M Axante trading as Julia’s Removals — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406323/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Omorogbe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Manchester on 12 November 2021, Employment Judge Leach heard the matter with the claimant appearing in person and the respondents not in attendance. The tribunal recorded a single finding: the respondents had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The judgment ordered the respondents to pay the claimant £1,173.03 gross. No separate breakdown of the award was given in the judgment, and no other substantive claims or remedies were identified in the extracted text.
The notice attached to the judgment stated that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum was not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondents had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,173.03 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,173
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.