Case 2406333/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Wilkinson and Mrs K Mulligan v Green Eco Technologies Engineering Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406333/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Hodgson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Wilkinson and Mrs K Mulligan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester by CVP before Employment Judge B Hodgson on 4 and 5 May 2021, held that the unfair dismissal claims brought by Mrs C Wilkinson and Mrs K Mulligan were well-founded. It ordered Green Eco Technologies Engineering Company Limited to pay Mrs Wilkinson a compensatory award of £1,852.89 and Mrs Mulligan a compensatory award of £1,546.98.
The written decision record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning in detail because the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The only remedy recorded in the written judgment is compensatory award; no basic award, injury to feelings award, or separate interest figure is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs C Wilkinson's unfair dismissal claim was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered a compensatory award of £1,852.89. | Upheld | — | £1,853 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs K Mulligan's unfair dismissal claim was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered a compensatory award of £1,546.98. | Upheld | — | £1,547 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,400
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,400
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.