Case 2406357/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Mosdell v Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406357/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Mosdell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent’s response was struck out after the liquidator confirmed that it was not being actively pursued, and the tribunal determined the case under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant’s unfair dismissal and breach of contract complaints had been presented outside the ordinary time limits, but the tribunal accepted the explanation in the particulars of claim and held that it was not reasonably practicable for those claims to have been brought in time and that they had been brought within such further period as was reasonable.
The claimant succeeded in her claim for a statutory redundancy payment, which was awarded at £792 on the basis of 1.5 weeks per year for 3 years using a gross weekly pay of £176. The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal said it would have awarded a basic award of £792, but reduced that to nil under s.122(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the redundancy payment had already been awarded. It then awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights and no compensation for post-dismissal earnings because it found the claimant’s employment would have ended on 20 February 2020 in any event.
The breach of contract claim succeeded because the claimant had been dismissed without notice when she was entitled to one month’s notice, and damages of £693.33 net were ordered. The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid for 5 days of holiday accrued but untaken at the end of employment and ordered payment of £160 gross. The total payable to the claimant was £2,145.33, and the recoupment regulations did not apply to the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at 1.5 weeks x 3 years x £176 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £792 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £792 was reduced to nil under s.122(4) ERA 1996 because of the redundancy payment; £500 awarded for loss of statutory rights; no award for post-dismissal earnings. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal without notice in breach of contract; claimant was entitled to one month’s notice and was awarded £693.33 net. | Upheld | — | £693 |
| Holiday pay | Five days' accrued but untaken holiday at termination; awarded £160.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,145
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- not reasonably practicable / reasonable further period for time limits
- s.122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.