Case 2406359/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mosdell v Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406359/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mosdell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent’s response was struck out after the liquidator confirmed it was not being actively pursued, and the tribunal determined the case under rule 21. The claimant’s unfair dismissal and breach of contract complaints had been brought outside the relevant time limits, but the tribunal accepted the explanation in the particulars of claim and found it was not reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time, so they were allowed to proceed.
The claimant succeeded in his statutory redundancy payment claim. The tribunal ordered payment of £352.00, calculated on the basis of one week, two years’ service, and £176 gross weekly pay. The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal said it would have awarded a basic award of £352.00, but reduced that to nil under s.122(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the redundancy payment had already been awarded.
For unfair dismissal remedy, the tribunal awarded £500.00 for loss of statutory rights. It made no award for post-dismissal earnings because it found the claimant’s employment would have ended on 20 February 2020 in any event. The total unfair dismissal award was therefore £500.00.
The claimant also succeeded on his breach of contract complaint. The tribunal found he had been dismissed without notice in breach of his employment contract and was entitled to one month’s notice. Damages were assessed at £693.33 net. In addition, the tribunal found that two days’ accrued but untaken holiday remained unpaid on termination and ordered £64.00 gross in respect of that claim. The total payable was £1,609.33, and the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at £352.00, calculated as 1 week x 2 years x £176 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £352 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded. The tribunal said it would have awarded a basic award of £352.00, but reduced that to nil under s.122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 because of the statutory redundancy payment already awarded. It awarded £500.00 for loss of statutory rights and no compensation for post-dismissal earnings because employment would have ended on 20 February 2020 in any event. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice in breach of contract and was entitled to one month’s notice. Damages were awarded at £693.33 net. | Upheld | — | £693 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 2 days’ accrued but untaken holiday remained unpaid at termination and ordered £64.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £64 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,609
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable time limit test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.