Case 2406375/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Camden-Clarke v Super Hospitality Group Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406375/2020
- Decision date
- 15 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Camden-Clarke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Phil Allen determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that Super Hospitality Group Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms K Camden-Clarke's wages and ordered that first respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,510.84.
The judgment also dismissed the claim against Ditto Payroll Ltd. No separate legal test was set out in the short reasons, and the decision contains no split of the award between respondents beyond the order against the first respondent. The attached interest notice explained the tribunal's standard post-judgment interest regime, with 14 days from service and an 8% stipulated rate, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest on the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The first respondent, Super Hospitality Group Limited, was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,510.84. The claim against the second respondent, Ditto Payroll Ltd, was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £1,511 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,511
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.