Case 2406377/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Ollerenshaw v Hightown Pub Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406377/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Ollerenshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 May 2023, the tribunal gave Miss A Ollerenshaw an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Dunlop struck out the claim on 3 October 2023. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability, no findings on the underlying employment issues, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit and does not separate the underlying heads of claim; breach of contract is taken from the case listing metadata. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit and does not separate the underlying heads of claim; unlawful deduction from wages is taken from the case listing metadata. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.