Case 2406394/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Mayat v Al Jamiah Al Islamiyyah — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406394/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Mayat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The listed hearing on 16 November 2022 was cancelled. The judgment records that the tribunal could properly make a determination of the claim on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,136.32 gross, with the calculation set out in the judgment as £356.40 per week, divided by 5 to give £71.28 per day, multiplied by 44 days. The judgment explains that the 44 days comprised 5 days for October 2021 half term, 10 days for the December 2021 winter break, 5 days for the February 2022 half term break, and 24 days for April 2022 holidays.
The award is stated to be gross, with the claimant required to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on it. The accompanying interest notice states that interest would be payable on any unpaid award after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest sum is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined on a Rule 21 basis after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states only that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of a gross sum of £3,136.32; the substantive statutory label is not stated expressly in the judgment, so the claim is classified as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,136 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,136
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.