Case 2406405/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Peart v Ministry of Defence — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406405/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Peart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the Tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out on the basis that there were no reasonable prospects of establishing that it would be just and equitable to extend time for discrimination complaints brought outside the primary time limit.
The Tribunal decided that the claim should not be struck out on that basis. It also decided that no deposit orders should be imposed as a condition for continuing with any parts of the claim. The judgment records the outcome of those preliminary applications only and does not determine the substantive discrimination complaints.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is from an open preliminary hearing. It records that discrimination complaints were not struck out and no deposit orders were made, but it does not determine the substantive discrimination claims or specify the protected characteristics in the judgment text. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospects
- just and equitable to extend time
- Deposit Orders
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.