Case 2406408/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Taleporos v Sunrise UK Operation Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406408/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Taleporos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 June 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs L Taleporos an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing to do so, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were failure to comply with case management orders issued on 8 October 2020 and/or that the claim had not been actively pursued. A reply was required by 18 June 2021.
No reply was received, either before or after the deadline, and the claimant did not make representations opposing strike out or request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive determination of the underlying claims.
The reasons are brief and procedural only. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment records no liability findings on the merits of any discrimination, dismissal, whistleblowing, working time, or other substantive complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for failure to comply with case management orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.