Case 2406421/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L French v Thomas Davin t/a The Chorlton Green — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406421/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L French
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Franey, amended the respondent's title to Thomas Davin t/a The Chorlton Green. The claimant, Miss L French, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found well founded the complaint that the respondent failed to pay the claimant for periods of annual leave under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment records that, under regulation 30(5), the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £166.73 due to her.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim was for unpaid annual leave under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found it well founded and ordered payment under regulation 30(5). | Upheld | — | £167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £167
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30(5) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.