Case 2406423/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Russell v Legalbrands Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406423/2019
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21. Employment Judge Warren Date recorded that the claimant, Mr L Russell, succeeded on his claim for unauthorised deductions from pay. The tribunal ordered Legalbrands Limited to pay the gross sum of £2,307.68, described as two months' wages.
The claimant also succeeded on his claim for accrued holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £384.60 in respect of 4 days' holiday pay. No other claims, remedy components, or reasons are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was owed two months' wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,307.68. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was owed accrued holiday pay for 4 days and ordered payment of £384.60. | Upheld | — | £385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.