Case 2406428/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Andrea Stevens v Wigan Borough Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406428/2024
- Decision date
- 20 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrea Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, heard the case by video at Manchester on 9 and 10 September 2025. The written record identifies the claimant as Andrea Stevens and the respondent as Wigan Borough Council.
The only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment is that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out any separate factual findings or legal reasoning beyond that conclusion.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment records that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.