Case 2406433/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Gibson v Mr J Foster — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406433/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holbrook REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 13 September 2019, Employment Judge Holbrook heard the case with both parties appearing in person. The tribunal upheld Mrs S Gibson's claims for statutory notice pay and holiday pay against Mr J Foster.
The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay £229.88, described as compensation for one week's notice pay and one week's accrued holiday entitlement. The decision does not break that total into separate sums for each claim.
The tribunal also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the claim for statutory notice pay. The judgment says the award covered one week's notice pay, but it does not split the total figure between this claim and the holiday pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for holiday pay. The judgment says the award covered one week's accrued holiday entitlement, but it does not allocate a separate monetary figure to this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.