Case 2406447/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Montgomery v Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited t/a Betfred — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406447/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Montgomery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 7 February 2020 before Employment Judge Benson. The claimant, Miss J Montgomery, did not attend. The respondent, Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited t/a Betfred, was represented by Ms S Murphy, solicitor.
The written judgment records that the respondent name was amended to Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited t/a Betfred. The tribunal then held that all claims were dismissed. No separate findings, liability analysis, or remedy awards are set out in the written record.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the face of the written judgment, there is no monetary award and no additional detail beyond dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed. The only available case classification is the Working Time Regulations listing category. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.