Case 2406464/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Wolstenholme v ABC Pre-School Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406464/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Wolstenholme
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 October 2019 before Employment Judge Slater, the parties informed the tribunal that they had agreed terms of settlement. The listed hearing was postponed to allow those terms to be implemented.
The tribunal ordered that if neither party applied on or before 8 November 2019 for the case to be restored to the hearing list, and with the claimant's consent, the matter would be treated as withdrawn by the claimant upon settlement and would stand dismissed without further order.
The extracted judgment does not record any determination of the merits of the unfair dismissal claim and does not set out any remedy award. It records only the settlement-based disposal mechanism and the deadline for any application to restore the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The parties agreed terms of settlement. The tribunal postponed the hearing to allow implementation of those terms and provided that, unless either party applied by 8 November 2019 to restore the case to the list, it would be treated as withdrawn by the claimant upon settlement and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.