Case 2406472/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Hindle v British Medical Association and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406472/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Hindle
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public CVP hearing in Manchester on 22 April 2024, Judge Johnson considered a complaint by Ms A Hindle against the British Medical Association and Claire Ashley. The Tribunal struck out the complaint of breach of section 168 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because it had been presented out of time, contrary to section 171 TULRCA, and therefore had no reasonable prospects of success under Rule 37(1)(a).
The judgment states that the remaining complaints of discrimination, harassment and victimisation were unaffected by this decision. Those claims were not determined at this hearing and were due to be heard at the final hearing listed for 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint of breach of section 168 TULRCA 1992 was struck out because it was presented out of time contrary to section 171 TULRCA and, under Rule 37(1)(a), had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 171 TULRCA
- Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.