Case 2406474/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Connolly v Submarine Manufacturing And Products Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406474/2019
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Connolly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment records that Mr R Connolly brought proceedings against Submarine Manufacturing And Products Limited under case number 2406474/2019. The tribunal stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on the merits, remedy, or legal tests are stated in the extracted text. The judgment is signed by Regional Employment Judge Parkin and was sent to the parties on 16 August 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.