Case 2406474/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Lection v Store Retail Group Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406474/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Lection
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 6 December 2022, Employment Judge Leach heard the claim in the claimant’s absence on the respondent’s side. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Store Retail Group Limited and held that Mr W Lection had been unfairly dismissed. It found that he contributed to his dismissal to some extent by the responses he gave at the disciplinary hearing, so a 20% deduction was made to the compensatory award. Because he had been given a right of appeal and did not appeal, a further 15% deduction was applied under s207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal also held that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed. It found that he was dismissed without notice in circumstances where his contract did not permit summary dismissal, and that he was entitled to one month’s contractual notice. On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £480 for unfair dismissal and accepted the compensatory heads as loss of statutory rights at £500 and loss of income from 18 June 2022 to 11 July 2022 at £1,667.50, before applying the overall 35% deduction.
After the deductions, the tribunal recorded a compensatory award of £1,062.68 for unfair dismissal and ordered payment of £1,542.68 for unfair dismissal in total. It separately ordered payment of £1,667.50 gross for breach of contract arising from the wrongful dismissal. The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 December 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It applied a 20% deduction to the compensatory award because his responses at the disciplinary hearing contributed to the dismissal to some extent, and a further 15% deduction under s207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because he had a right of appeal but did not appeal. | Upheld | — | £1,543 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice in circumstances where the contract did not permit that. It found he was entitled to one month’s contractual notice and awarded one month’s salary gross. | Upheld | — | £1,668 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,210
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £480
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,063
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.