Case 2406482/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Anderson v Capita Retail Financial Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406482/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 July 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr L Anderson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 24, 25 and 26 April 2024 would no longer take place. No merits findings or remedy awards were made in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not identify or adjudicate any underlying pleaded causes of action. It was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 3 July 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.