Case 2406486/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Parkinson v Pipetech Services NW Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406486/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Parkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester by CVP before Employment Judge McDonald sitting alone, held that Mr Mark Parkinson was a worker of Pipetech Services NW Limited for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for the whole period he worked for the respondent, from 24 August 2015 to 1 July 2022. On that basis, his claim to be entitled to holiday pay for that period succeeded.
The judgment records no separate monetary remedy because the tribunal listed a remedy hearing for later determination. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant was a worker of the respondent for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for the whole period from 24 August 2015 to 1 July 2022, and that his claim to holiday pay for that period succeeded. A remedy hearing was listed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.