Case 2406491/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Majendie v Bark & Birch Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406491/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Majendie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages for March and April 2022 and ordered payment of £4,326.90 gross, calculated as £721.15 for six weeks.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, but no damages were awarded because the claimant had fully mitigated her loss. In addition, the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £2,451.91 for 17 days of accrued annual leave on termination.
Further breach of contract awards were made for unreimbursed expenses incurred in March and April 2022, in the sum of £591.60, and for pension contributions deducted from pay but not applied to the claimant’s pension, in the sum of £2,500.80. The judgment included a notice that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if sums were not paid within 14 days; the stated calculation day was 20 December 2022 and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; gross award for March and April 2022 wages. | Upheld | — | £4,327 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; no damages because the claimant fully mitigated her loss. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement and accrued annual leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £2,452 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to reimburse expenses incurred in March and April 2022. | Upheld | — | £592 |
| Breach of contract | Pension contributions were deducted from pay but not applied to the claimant's pension. | Upheld | — | £2,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,871
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.