Case 2406514/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Montana v The Carphone Warehouse Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406514/2019
- Decision date
- 13 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Montana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Montana brought proceedings against The Carphone Warehouse Limited in case 2406514/2019, with the case listing identifying disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. The judgment dated 8 July 2020, sent to the parties on 13 July 2020, records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings are recorded on the substance of either claim. The judgment does not set out any liability analysis, does not identify any remedy, and does not refer to any legal test or panel members. The record therefore shows a withdrawn case rather than a determination on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The case listing identifies a disability discrimination claim, but the judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and gives no separate merits finding. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The case listing identifies an unfair dismissal claim, but the judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and gives no separate merits finding. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.