Case 2406566/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Jogee v Greater Manchester Football Club Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406566/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Jogee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge entered judgment under rule 21 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the tribunal said a determination could properly be made without a hearing, and the hearing listed for 5 December 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr H Jogee the gross sum of £1,180, described in the judgment as £905 x 2 months for March and April 2022.
A separate notice on interest accompanied the judgment. It stated that the relevant decision day was 28 November 2022, the calculation day was 29 November 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after the applicable 14-day period. No separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,180, described as £905 x 2 months for March and April 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,180
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.