Case 2406577/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Ryder v Jst Nutrition Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406577/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Ryder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the employment judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that JST Nutrition Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Ryder's wages for June, July and August 2022.
The tribunal ordered payment of £5,365.12 net for the unpaid wages, with no deductions for tax or national insurance from that sum, although the respondent was required to account to HMRC. The tribunal also found that Mr Ryder had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered a redundancy payment of £5,830.00, calculated as £4,240 for eight complete years of service aged between 22 and 41 and £1,590 for two years of service aged 41 or older. The hearing listed for 7 March 2023 was cancelled.
The notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stated that interest would be payable on awards if not paid within 14 days after the written record was sent, with the relevant decision day given as 1 March 2023, the calculation day as 2 March 2023, and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for June, July and August 2022 and ordered payment of £5,365.12 net. The judgment states that no tax or national insurance deductions are to be made from that sum, and that the respondent must account to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £5,365 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that Mr Ryder was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered a redundancy payment of £5,830.00. The figure is broken down in the judgment as £4,240 for eight complete years of service aged between 22 and 41, plus £1,590 for two years of service aged 41 or older. | Upheld | — | £5,830 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,195
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.