Case 2406601/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Harkness v Upperby Social Club Limited (in Receivership) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406601/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Harkness
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Harkness succeeded in her claims for a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and for breach of contract arising from unpaid notice of termination of employment. The judgment records that both claims were upheld against Upperby Social Club Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £4,275.00. This comprised a redundancy payment of £3,037.50 and unpaid notice pay of £1,237.50, described as 11 weeks net notice pay.
The written record also includes the standard tribunal notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant decision day as 10 November 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum if the award remains unpaid after the relevant period. No separate quantified interest award is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim succeeded under Part XI Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £3,037.50. | Upheld | — | £3,038 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded for unpaid notice of termination of employment. The tribunal awarded £1,237.50 for 11 weeks' net notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,238 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,275
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.