Case 2406602/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Ferguson v Upperby Social Club Limited (in Receivership) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406602/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Ferguson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs C Ferguson brought claims against Upperby Social Club Limited for a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and for breach of contract in respect of unpaid notice of termination of employment. The tribunal upheld both claims.
The judgment records a total award of £4,275.00. That sum was made up of a redundancy payment of £3,037.50 and unpaid notice pay of £1,237.50, described as 11 weeks net notice pay. No separate breakdown beyond those two components is given in the judgment.
The written record also includes the tribunal's standard notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself. The decision was sent to the parties on 10 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim succeeded under Part XI Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £3,038 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded for unpaid notice of termination of employment (11 weeks net). | Upheld | — | £1,238 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,275
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.