Case 2406625/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Harwood v SLG DB Limited (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406625/2022
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Harwood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr C Harwood's claim in its entirety. It recorded that by a letter dated 15 March 2024 the claimant was asked to provide further information, which he failed to do.
The tribunal then issued a strike out warning letter dated 10 June 2024, giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety because the claimant failed to provide further information after a letter dated 15 March 2024 and did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the strike out warning letter dated 10 June 2024. The judgment does not specify the underlying causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.