Case 2406644/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Aitchison v Stevens Equipment Rental Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406644/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shergill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Aitchison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Aitchison worked for Stevens Equipment Rental Limited as a dump truck driver. The tribunal found that his employment started on 01/03/2016, not an earlier date, and that he had been given and signed a contract of employment. It found the contract was in substance a zero-hours contract, with no obligation on the respondent to provide work and only limited guaranteed payments when not working.
The central dispute was whether the claimant was dismissed on 08/02/2023 or resigned later. The tribunal accepted that he was removed from the Uxbridge site on 08/02/2023 after issues involving PPE and attitude, but it found that PM did not say he was "laid off" or use unambiguous words amounting to dismissal. It relied in part on the contemporaneous "daily emails" showing PM continuing to treat the claimant as available for work and trying to place him after 08/02/2023, and it rejected the claimant's account on the key dismissal conversation.
The tribunal found that the claimant resigned when he chose to take a self-employed role through an umbrella company on 08/03/2023, and that the respondent had continued to treat him as employed until that point. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim failed, the tribunal also found there was no redundancy dismissal, and the breach of contract / notice pay claim failed because the claimant had resigned. The holiday pay issue was recorded as settled because the respondent paid holiday pay on 24/03/2023 and the claimant accepted it. The claim for failure to provide written particulars under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 was dismissed because the claimant had signed the contract and, in any event, the relevant provisions did not apply retrospectively to the 2016 contract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded as settled because the respondent paid holiday pay on 24/03/2023 and the claimant accepted that payment. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim dismissed; the tribunal found the claimant resigned on 08/03/2023 when he signed a self-employed umbrella-company contract, and was not dismissed on 08/02/2023 or made redundant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed, including the notice pay point, because the claimant resigned and was not entitled to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002; the tribunal found the claimant had received and signed the contract, and in any event the relevant provisions were not retrospective to this 2016 contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- B G Gale Ltd v Gilbert [1978] IRLR 453
- Sothern v Franks Charlesly & Co [1981] IRLR 278
- Willoughby v CF Capital Ltd [2011] IRLR 985
- Edwards v Surrey Police 1999 IRLR 456
- Johnson v Monty Smith Garages Ltd EAT 657/79
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.