Case 2406659/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Baguley v PLM Motors Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406659/2023
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Baguley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 16 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why its response should not be struck out. The reasons recorded were that the respondent had not attended the preliminary hearing listed for 16 November 2023, had not provided reasons or objections within seven days, and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but may participate only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the respondent's response. It did not determine the underlying substantive claim on the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.