Case 2406661/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Newman v Kraken Corals Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406661/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Newman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal by CVP on 6 December 2022 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The claimant, Mr M Newman, did not attend. The respondent, Kraken Corals Limited, was represented by Mr Knight.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because of the claimant's non-attendance. It also dismissed the claim for other payments under the same rule for the same reason. The decision does not contain findings on the merits of either claim or any monetary award, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing on 6 December 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers only to a claim for 'other payments'; it was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing on 6 December 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.