Case 2406663/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gleeson v DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406663/2023
- Decision date
- 22 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gleeson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Liverpool by CVP on 3 April 2024, before Employment Judge Ainscough sitting alone, the respondent applied to strike out the claimant's direct age discrimination claim, direct disability discrimination claim, and breach of contract claim. The tribunal allowed that application in full and dismissed those three claims.
The judgment records that the remaining claims were not determined at this hearing and would proceed to final hearing. Written reasons were not provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The respondent's strike-out application succeeded and the direct age discrimination claim was dismissed. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The respondent's strike-out application succeeded and the direct disability discrimination claim was dismissed. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's strike-out application succeeded and the breach of contract claim was dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.