Case 2406670/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Moore v The Co-Operative Group Limited HELD AT: Liverpool (in public, via CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406670/2023
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Moore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Liverpool on 3 and 4 June 2024, before Employment Judge Anderson, the tribunal dismissed Mr A Moore's unfair dismissal claim. The published decision records only the operative finding that the claim was not well-founded; it does not set out written reasons for the tribunal's reasoning in the text provided.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim for a redundancy payment, again stating that it was not well-founded. The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the published record contains the outcomes but not a detailed explanation of the tribunal's assessment or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claim for a redundancy payment was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.