Case 2406677/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Arabadzhiyska v Vegan House Foods Ltd (in voluntary administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406677/2024
- Decision date
- 22 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Arabadzhiyska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, acting under Rule 22, found that Vegan House Foods Ltd had failed to pay A Arabadzhiyska's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,352.00 in respect of that entitlement.
The judgment records that the claimant also sought what was described as fair compensation, but the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to award such compensation in the circumstances. No separate award was made for that request.
The written decision was approved by Employment Judge Butler and sent to the parties on 22 January 2025. The accompanying notice states that interest would only become relevant if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, but the judgment itself does not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,352.00. The judgment also states that no award was made for what the claimant described as fair compensation because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to award such compensation in the circumstances. | Upheld | — | £2,352 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,352
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.