Case 2406682/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Hollymount Residential and Dementia Care Centre and Longfield Care Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406682/2023
- Decision date
- 29 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester by CVP on 27 September 2023 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and there was no attendance for the respondents. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment record.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against the second respondent was well-founded. It ordered the second respondent, Longfield Care Homes Limited, to pay the claimant £158.67 forthwith.
The award was made up of £39.67 for an underpayment of wages, calculated as £79 less £39.33 already paid by the respondent since the proceedings were instituted, and £119 for unauthorised deductions from the claimant's final pay. The judgment states that the £39.67 element is a gross payment and that the claimant must account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on that sum.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against the first respondent, Hollymount Residential and Dementia Care Centre, was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. The written record also includes a notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that the relevant decision day was 29 September 2023 and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after the applicable period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint against the second respondent; the tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay £158.67 forthwith. | Upheld | — | £159 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint against the first respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £159
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.