Case 2406734/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Esi v Barchester Healthcare Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406734/2024
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Esi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal claim brought pursuant to sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim because the claimant did not have two years' service with the respondent at the time her employment ended.
The judgment states that the claimant's other claims are not affected by this judgment and will proceed to hearing. It does not identify those other claims or decide their merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim pursuant to s95 and s98 Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have two years' service when employment ended. The judgment states other claims are not affected and will proceed to hearing, but does not identify or adjudicate those other claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.