Case 2406738/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Kelly v Legend Group North West Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406738/2022
- Decision date
- 5 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Kelly worked for Legend Group North West Limited from 20 June 2022 to 1 July 2022 as a cleaner in student accommodation in Liverpool. She was not paid for that work and said she contacted her manager, Craig, but received no positive response. She then contacted ACAS and obtained an early conciliation certificate dated 31 August 2022 before presenting proceedings on 1 September 2022.
The respondent did not file a response or attend the hearing. Employment Judge Robinson recorded that the tribunal was satisfied the respondent’s officers knew of the claim and chose not to serve a response or attend. On the evidence from the claimant, the tribunal accepted that she remained owed £156.
The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £156 forthwith. The written record also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would accrue if the award remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day of 5 January 2023, but no separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £156 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £156
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.