Case 2406740/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T R Taylor v Modular Group Limited (In creditors' voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406740/2024
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs T R Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint in respect of a redundancy payment. In a letter dated 4 December 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why that claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The Tribunal recorded that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had not been employed for two complete years when employment ended, so the right to a redundancy payment did not arise.
The claimant did not make any representations or request a hearing. The redundancy payment claim was therefore struck out under Rule 38(1)(a). The Tribunal noted that the claimant’s remaining claims would be considered at a case management hearing on 11 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) after the Tribunal found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had not been employed for two complete years when employment ended, so the right to a redundancy payment did not arise. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38(1)(a)
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.