Case 2406750/2024 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr D Lee 2. Mr G Bolton v Reeds Garage Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406750/2024
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr D Lee 2. Mr G Bolton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the joined judgment for cases 2406750/2024 and 2406751/2024, the tribunal made a rule 22 determination after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the hearing listed for 28 and 29 October 2025 was cancelled. This record concerns Mr D Lee's claim. The tribunal found that Reeds Garage Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from wages of £640.23 and had failed to pay holiday entitlement of £896.32.
The tribunal also found that Mr D Lee was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,524.14, calculated as 18 years x 1 x £640.23. The unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded and the tribunal held that he had been unfairly dismissed, but no basic award was made because it had been extinguished by the redundancy payment.
On notice, the tribunal found that Mr D Lee had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages of £2,560.92, being four weeks' gross pay at £640.23 per week. The judgment states that this was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. The total gross sum payable to Mr D Lee was £15,621.61.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded at 18 years x 1 x £640.23. | Upheld | — | £11,524 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £896 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £640 |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint was well-founded; no basic award was made because it was extinguished by the redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for notice at four weeks' gross pay, calculated gross to reflect likely tax on Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £2,561 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,622
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.