Case 2406751/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Johnson v Skin Medical Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406751/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms M Johnson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Johnson brought claims against Skin Medical Limited and Mr William Smith for detriment related to maternity leave under Reg 19 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999 and s.47C Employment Rights Act 1996. At the hearing before Employment Judge Anderson on 5 May 2023, the tribunal recorded that those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also refused all remaining applications made by the Respondent for strike out and deposit orders. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parental leave | The written judgment states that the claims against both Respondents for detriment related to maternity leave under Reg 19 of the Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999 and s.47C Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.