Case 2406821/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Laimute Sabaliuskaite And v Wilko Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406821/2023
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Laimute Sabaliuskaite And
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms Laimute Sabaliuskaite’s claims against Wilko Ltd were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive merits findings were made, and the text does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
The reasons note that the claim was presented in the North West Region of the Employment Tribunals (England and Wales) and later transferred to the Midlands (East) Region under presidential case management order 171 because the respondent had entered administration. The judge observed that this transfer may have been arguable in error because the basis of the claim related to the claimant’s earlier dismissal.
The tribunal then recorded that correspondence from the claimant’s solicitor dated 9 September 2024 gave clear and unequivocal withdrawal of the claim and invited the claims to be dismissed. On that basis, Employment Judge Clark dismissed the claims. No lay members are listed, and no legal test is cited in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify separate findings on this claim. The order states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify separate findings on this claim. The order states that the claimant’s claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.