Case 2406850/2025 · Employment Tribunal
T Freeman v The Crafted Experience Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2406850/2025
- Decision date
- 20 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Freeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld T Freeman's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against The Crafted Experience Ltd for the period 1 September to 31 October 2025. The claim was presented on 3 December 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and an Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The respondent was ordered to pay £2,876.54 gross. This comprised £1,775.94 for September 2025 and £1,300.60 for October 2025, totalling £3,076.54, less £200 already paid by the respondent. The claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance not deducted by the respondent.
The judgment was approved by Legal Officer Higgins on 20 August 2026 and sent to the parties on 21 August 2026. The accompanying notice states that interest accrues at 8% per annum from 22 August 2026 if the award is not paid in full within 14 days after the decision was sent. No monetary amount of interest was specified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,877 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,877
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.