Case 2406855/2023 · Employment Tribunal
O Rigby v Monte Hotels Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406855/2023
- Decision date
- 19 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
O Rigby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester on 12 to 14 August 2024 before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone. The claimant, O Rigby, appeared in person and the respondent, Monte Hotels Limited, was represented by its HR manager, E Hewitt.
The tribunal's judgment was that the complaint of unfair dismissal for making protected disclosure(s) was not well-founded and was dismissed. The record does not set out written reasons because the reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
No monetary award was recorded and no remedy was made. The public record is limited to the dismissal outcome and does not include further findings of fact or legal analysis in the written judgment extract provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the complaint was of unfair dismissal for making protected disclosure(s), and that it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.