Case 2406858/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Putterill v Abbey Grange Care Home Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406858/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Putterill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the judgment issued under Rule 21, Employment Judge Phil Allen found that Abbey Grange Care Home Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss S Putterill's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,191.80. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £916.20.
The claim for unfair dismissal also succeeded, but the remedy for that claim was not determined in this judgment and was listed to be decided at the hearing on 13 November 2023. The written record also included the tribunal's standard interest notice, stating that interest would be payable on awards if not paid within 14 days and giving 23 October 2023 as the relevant decision day, 24 October 2023 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,192 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £916 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded; remedy was to be determined at the hearing listed for 13 November 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,108
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.