Case 2406864/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Garnett v Smilesite Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406864/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs V Garnett brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Smilesite Limited. The case was heard by video at Manchester on 5 October 2023 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The claimant was self-represented and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal made a finding that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was entitled to receive £2,071.86, calculated as £12.75 per hour for 32.5 hours over 5 weeks, but that £308.20 had to be deducted as the cost to replace damaged equipment. That produced a gross sum of £1,763.68. The tribunal found that the claimant received £0 for the period in question.
The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,763.68. The judgment noted that, because the figure is gross, the claimant may receive a lesser amount if the respondent satisfies any statutory deductions before payment, and that tax and national insurance liability would then rest with the claimant if not accounted for by the respondent. The judgment also records that duplicate claims under case numbers 2408849/2023 and 2408860/2023 were dismissed on withdrawal in separate judgments and did not affect this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,763.68. It noted that the claimant had received £0 for the relevant period and that the sum was calculated by taking £2,071.86 and deducting £308.20 for the cost to replace damaged equipment. The judgment also states that the amount is gross and may be reduced by statutory deductions if applicable. | Upheld | — | £1,764 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,764
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.