Case 2406915/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Nelson v Clothes Aid Services Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406915/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Nelson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson, sitting alone, heard Ms P Nelson's claims against Clothes Aid Services Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) on 13 March 2023. The tribunal held that the claims for a redundancy payment, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay were well-founded.
The tribunal did not order the respondent to pay any additional sums. It recorded that, following her dismissal, the claimant had already received the appropriate level of payments from the Redundancy Payments Service. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Found well-founded; the tribunal also recorded that the claimant had already received the appropriate level of payments from the Redundancy Payments Service, so no additional sum was ordered. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This related to notice pay and was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This related to holiday pay and was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.