Case 2406921/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Moores v Grace Fabrication Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406921/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Moores
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 March 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr S Moores an opportunity to confirm that he had applied to have Grace Fabrication Limited restored to the Register of Companies. The reason for that request is not expanded upon in the judgment, but the Tribunal required confirmation that such an application had been made, or that he intended to take that step, for the claim to proceed.
The claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order of 15 March 2024. He did not confirm that he had applied to restore the respondent company to the Register of Companies, and he did not confirm any intention to do so. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim pursuant to rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made. The judgment records only the procedural strike out, with Employment Judge Tobin Date signing the decision on 20 March 2024 and the judgment being sent to the parties on 22 March 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim type. It states that 'the claim' was struck out under rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order of 15 March 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.